Skip to main content

Android ja Bluetooth


Android-ohjelma, jota teen töissä toimii kaukosäätimenä erilaisille moottorinohjaimille. Kaukosäädin toimii bluetoothilla. Androidin SDK:n mukana tulee hyvä esimerkkiprojekti bluetoothin käyttämisestä, jonka pohjalta on helppo aloittaa. Androidiin bluetooth muistuttaa mitä tahansa verkkosockettia jolla on sisääntulo ja ulostulostreamit, joihin voi kirjoittaa samanaikaisesti. Bluetooth toimikin testipuhelimellani (2.1) suhteellisen pienen työn jälkeen moitteettomasti.

Viime viikolla testasin laitteilla, joissa oli Androidin versiot 2.3 ja 4.0.1 ja näissä ei ollut toivoakaan saada yhteyttä testilankkuun. Ongelmat johtuivat vielä eri syistä molemmissa laitteissa. Pahinta oli että toimimattomuus oli satunnaista, joten en ollut täysin varma onko vika testilankussa vai puhelimessa.

Löysin muutaman Androidin ratkaisemattoman bugiraportin, joissa viitattiin käsittelemiini ongelmiin. Ratkaisuksi annettiin muutamia väliaikaisia korjauskikkoja, mutta nämäkään eivät auttaneet tapauksessani.

Ongelmien lähteenä on sokettiyhteyden muodostus, joka toimii blokkaavasti 2.1 versiossa, mutta ei muissa testaamissani laitteissa.
Log.i(BT_TAG, "Connecting");
btSocket.connect();
Log.i(BT_TAG, "Connected");
2.1-versiossa suoritus pysähtyy connect()-kutsuun kunnes yhteys on luotu, mutta muissa versioissa yhteys luodaan, vaikka sitä todellisuudessa ei ole. Yhteys katkeaa vasta kun sokettiin yritetään kirjoittaa jotain.

Ratkaisuna tein ylimääräisen kättelyn varmistamaan, onko yhteys todella luotu. Heti kun input ja output streamit on luotu lähetän outputtiin kättelykomennon ja jos vastaus saadaan, siirrytään vasta silloin yhdistetyyn tilaan. Jos vastausta ei saada, onneksi Android osaa itse heittää poikkeuksen ja sulkea soketin.

Tässä ei sinänsä ole mitään erikoista, mutta tuntuu turhalta, koska käyttöjärjestelmän pitäisi hoitaa Bluetooth-protokollan mukaisen yhteyden luomisen. Varsin ikävää on, etteivät eri Android-versiot toimi luvatulla tavalla.
private class ConnectedThread extends Thread {
private BluetoothSocket mmSocket;
private InputStream mmInStream;
private OutputStream mmOutStream;
private boolean isAvailable = false;

public ConnectedThread(BluetoothSocket socket) {
Log.d(BT_TAG, "create ConnectedThread");
mmSocket = socket;
InputStream tmpIn = null;
OutputStream tmpOut = null;
// Get the BluetoothSocket input and output streams
try {
tmpIn = socket.getInputStream();
tmpOut = socket.getOutputStream();
} catch (IOException e) {
Log.e(BT_TAG, "temp sockets not created", e);
}
mmInStream = tmpIn;
mmOutStream = tmpOut;
//Handshake
write(HANDSHAKE);
// sendSuccessfulConnectionBroadCast();
}

public void run() {
Log.i(BT_TAG, "BEGIN mConnectedThread");
byte[] buffer = new byte[Protocol.RESPONSE_LENGTH];
int i = 0;
// Keep listening to the InputStream while connected
while (true) {
try {
// Read from the InputStream
// bytes = mmInStream.read(buffer);
int readByte = mmInStream.read();
Log.i(BT_TAG, "Read: " + readByte);
buffer[i] = (byte) readByte;
i++;
//Listen for the handshake confirmation
if (i == Protocol.RESPONSE_LENGTH) {
if (!isAvailable) {
isAvailable = true;
listenState = false;
sendSuccessfulConnectionBroadCast();
i = 0;
continue;
} 
GlobalHandler
.getHandler()
.obtainMessage(
GlobalHandler.MESSAGE_RESPONSE,
buffer).sendToTarget();
Log.i(BT_TAG, "Read: " + buffer[0] + " "
+ buffer[1] + " " + buffer[2] + " "
+ buffer[3] + " " + buffer[4]);
i = 0;
listenState = false;

}
} catch (IOException e) {
Log.e(BT_TAG, "Disconnected", e);
break;
}
}
}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RocksDB data recovery

I recently needed to do some maintenance on a RocksDB key-value store. The task was simple enough, just delete some keys as the db served as a cache and did not contain any permanent data. I used the RocksDB cli administration tool ldb to erase the keys. After running a key scan with it, I got this error Failed: Corruption: Snappy not supported or corrupted Snappy compressed block contents So a damaged database. Fortunately, there's a tool to fix it, and after running it, I had access to the db via the admin tool. All the data was lost though. Adding and removing keys worked fine but all the old keys were gone. It turned out that the corrupted data was all the data there was. The recovery tool made a backup folder, and I recovered the data by taking the files from the backup folder and manually changing the CURRENT file to point to the old MANIFEST file which is apparently how RocksDB knows which sst (table) files to use. I could not access the data with the admin tool, ...

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful.  Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro...

PydanticAI + evals + LiteLLM pipeline

I gave a tech talk at a Python meetup titled "Overengineering an LLM pipeline". It's based on my experiences of building production-grade stuff with LLMs I'm not sure how overengineered it actually turned out. Experimental would be a better term as it is using PydanticAI graphs library, which is in its very early stages as of writing this, although arguably already better than some of the pipeline libraries. Anyway, here is a link to it. It is a CLI poker app where you play one hand against an LLM. The LLM (theoretically) gets better with a self-correcting mechanism based on the evaluation score from another LLM. It uses the annotated past games as an additional context to potentially improve its decision-making. https://github.com/juho-y/archipylago-poker