Skip to main content

Android ja Bluetooth


Android-ohjelma, jota teen töissä toimii kaukosäätimenä erilaisille moottorinohjaimille. Kaukosäädin toimii bluetoothilla. Androidin SDK:n mukana tulee hyvä esimerkkiprojekti bluetoothin käyttämisestä, jonka pohjalta on helppo aloittaa. Androidiin bluetooth muistuttaa mitä tahansa verkkosockettia jolla on sisääntulo ja ulostulostreamit, joihin voi kirjoittaa samanaikaisesti. Bluetooth toimikin testipuhelimellani (2.1) suhteellisen pienen työn jälkeen moitteettomasti.

Viime viikolla testasin laitteilla, joissa oli Androidin versiot 2.3 ja 4.0.1 ja näissä ei ollut toivoakaan saada yhteyttä testilankkuun. Ongelmat johtuivat vielä eri syistä molemmissa laitteissa. Pahinta oli että toimimattomuus oli satunnaista, joten en ollut täysin varma onko vika testilankussa vai puhelimessa.

Löysin muutaman Androidin ratkaisemattoman bugiraportin, joissa viitattiin käsittelemiini ongelmiin. Ratkaisuksi annettiin muutamia väliaikaisia korjauskikkoja, mutta nämäkään eivät auttaneet tapauksessani.

Ongelmien lähteenä on sokettiyhteyden muodostus, joka toimii blokkaavasti 2.1 versiossa, mutta ei muissa testaamissani laitteissa.
Log.i(BT_TAG, "Connecting");
btSocket.connect();
Log.i(BT_TAG, "Connected");
2.1-versiossa suoritus pysähtyy connect()-kutsuun kunnes yhteys on luotu, mutta muissa versioissa yhteys luodaan, vaikka sitä todellisuudessa ei ole. Yhteys katkeaa vasta kun sokettiin yritetään kirjoittaa jotain.

Ratkaisuna tein ylimääräisen kättelyn varmistamaan, onko yhteys todella luotu. Heti kun input ja output streamit on luotu lähetän outputtiin kättelykomennon ja jos vastaus saadaan, siirrytään vasta silloin yhdistetyyn tilaan. Jos vastausta ei saada, onneksi Android osaa itse heittää poikkeuksen ja sulkea soketin.

Tässä ei sinänsä ole mitään erikoista, mutta tuntuu turhalta, koska käyttöjärjestelmän pitäisi hoitaa Bluetooth-protokollan mukaisen yhteyden luomisen. Varsin ikävää on, etteivät eri Android-versiot toimi luvatulla tavalla.
private class ConnectedThread extends Thread {
private BluetoothSocket mmSocket;
private InputStream mmInStream;
private OutputStream mmOutStream;
private boolean isAvailable = false;

public ConnectedThread(BluetoothSocket socket) {
Log.d(BT_TAG, "create ConnectedThread");
mmSocket = socket;
InputStream tmpIn = null;
OutputStream tmpOut = null;
// Get the BluetoothSocket input and output streams
try {
tmpIn = socket.getInputStream();
tmpOut = socket.getOutputStream();
} catch (IOException e) {
Log.e(BT_TAG, "temp sockets not created", e);
}
mmInStream = tmpIn;
mmOutStream = tmpOut;
//Handshake
write(HANDSHAKE);
// sendSuccessfulConnectionBroadCast();
}

public void run() {
Log.i(BT_TAG, "BEGIN mConnectedThread");
byte[] buffer = new byte[Protocol.RESPONSE_LENGTH];
int i = 0;
// Keep listening to the InputStream while connected
while (true) {
try {
// Read from the InputStream
// bytes = mmInStream.read(buffer);
int readByte = mmInStream.read();
Log.i(BT_TAG, "Read: " + readByte);
buffer[i] = (byte) readByte;
i++;
//Listen for the handshake confirmation
if (i == Protocol.RESPONSE_LENGTH) {
if (!isAvailable) {
isAvailable = true;
listenState = false;
sendSuccessfulConnectionBroadCast();
i = 0;
continue;
} 
GlobalHandler
.getHandler()
.obtainMessage(
GlobalHandler.MESSAGE_RESPONSE,
buffer).sendToTarget();
Log.i(BT_TAG, "Read: " + buffer[0] + " "
+ buffer[1] + " " + buffer[2] + " "
+ buffer[3] + " " + buffer[4]);
i = 0;
listenState = false;

}
} catch (IOException e) {
Log.e(BT_TAG, "Disconnected", e);
break;
}
}
}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bird is causing high CPU on my macOS

There is no lack of people complaining about MacOS Tahoe, mostly about rounded corners and inconsistent design decisions. I have not paid that much attentention to that, but there is one mac bug i have paid attention to. It hasn't been a visual or ux but rather few system processes pegging the CPU. trustd , alongside with ecosystemd and ecosystemanalyticsd all reported high CPU usage. I can't exactly recall when this started, it might have predated my Tahoe upgrade but anyway, the trio of processes all had high CPU usage. Sure, it may have been the virtual efficiency cores and whether it affeced battery life or slowed down other processes i don't know to be hon...

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful.  Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro...

How my work has changed in the past few years

When I started at my current job 3ish years ago, we had nothing but a few PowerPoint slides and a Figma prototype. I recall talking with one of the founders, whom I had worked with some 10 years ago, and pointing out that the very next step after PowerPoint and Figma was still the same as it had always been: translating those slides and mockups into CRUDs, forms, and other basic building blocks. Sure, all the new fancy tools and frameworks (we had jQuery then) help, but I still had to tinker with very basic primitives like tables and forms. I could not just say, "here is a table, here is a form." Well, yes, technically I could, but I still needed to write a lot of code to make a working form or table. This was around the time of GPT-3, Copilot beta, and very early Cursor. I did attempt to use them, but they could only perform very basic tasks and were pretty much useless for frontend work. We, being one of the first-wave "ChatGPT wrapper" startups has naturally pus...