Skip to main content

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession.

He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be?

When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful. 

Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying.


As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds profane. We should all be passionate developers! I wonder how well a job interview in tech goes if you say that you want to do boring stuff?

Perhaps it should go well. Frankly, the term passionate developer is misleading.

A passionate airplane pilot probably does not fly close to the ground or try to do a 747 loop-de-loop. Similarly, a passionate developer doesn't cowboy-code the whole backend with Remix in one sprint just to get a dopamine rush. A passionate developer is passionate not only about being nice to colleagues but also about code quality in a way where their fingerprint remains unnoticed, much like the airmanship of a skilled pilot. 

My airplane flying friend and I derive pleasure from a clean, by-the-book (by-the-documentation tbh) solution. I'm not too keen on leaving my mark on a codebase. The library I (and only I) love shall remain only on my personal pet projects. That must make me a dull, undesirable 1x engineer.

If everyone writes unpassionate code like me, that is likely a bad thing repressing the growth of new, better ideas. Perhaps a codebase needs, from time to time, someone who rewrites the weird auth part over the weekend in a manic flow state. However, my gut feeling is that we developers are a bit too biased towards doing just that.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RocksDB data recovery

I recently needed to do some maintenance on a RocksDB key-value store. The task was simple enough, just delete some keys as the db served as a cache and did not contain any permanent data. I used the RocksDB cli administration tool ldb to erase the keys. After running a key scan with it, I got this error Failed: Corruption: Snappy not supported or corrupted Snappy compressed block contents So a damaged database. Fortunately, there's a tool to fix it, and after running it, I had access to the db via the admin tool. All the data was lost though. Adding and removing keys worked fine but all the old keys were gone. It turned out that the corrupted data was all the data there was. The recovery tool made a backup folder, and I recovered the data by taking the files from the backup folder and manually changing the CURRENT file to point to the old MANIFEST file which is apparently how RocksDB knows which sst (table) files to use. I could not access the data with the admin tool, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Making dashboards more usable for LLMs

I’ve been looking into agentic workflows to act as an operations assistant for the SaaS I'm working on. A big part of that work is getting the assistant to make sense of all the alert and monitoring data that pours in every day. Passing a bunch of raw time-series data to an LLM generally doesn’t work that well. You need to tell the LLM to aggregate the data and give it the means to do so. Using aggregates will often lead to better insights from the LLM. This is a well-known fact to anyone who has tinkered with this (at least at the time of writing this). Humans, of course, like to build visualizations and dashboards to solve this issue (yes, yes, dashboards are often useless, but complaining about that is another blog post). LLMs can analyze them as well and in fact are pretty good at that, so the aggregate can be something both humans and LLMs can digest. I’ve been tinkering with the idea of appending some LLM-only content to a dashboard—for example, additional context, specific d...
Post a Comment
Read more