Vanta is a pretty good tool

On a project I've been working on, I've been preparing for SOC 2 Type II certification. My responsibilities have mostly been on the engineering/IT side, ensuring that our SaaS is deployed and developed according to SOC 2 processes.

This isn't something a developer would willingly or enthusiastically take on, right?

I can’t believe I’m saying this out loud, but actually... it hasn’t been that bad. The biggest reason for this has definitely been Vanta.

Vanta has distilled the rather hard-to-decipher process descriptions into actionable items. As far as I know, SOC 2 isn’t a one-size-fits-all (SaaS provider) certification; it differs according to the stack - which makes sense. Plugging in all our services, from cloud providers to issue trackers, spits out a tailored task list.

The task list can even include literal Terraform code examples, which you can copy-paste with minor changes. You could kind of get a similar list from AWS Audit Manager or AWS Security Hub, but Vanta is cloud-agnostic.

It’s like a ticketing template on steroids - or one of those rare automated security tools that actually proves useful. It ensures that secure practices continue in our organization, not only during the audit period but continuously. It also provides a trust center page for transparency where the customers eventually can download our SOC 2 report 🤞

The biggest benefit is definitely the automated integration with cloud providers. If you add all third-party services, you can get an offboarding and access review list out of the box.

Regarding process documentation, Vanta provides pre-filled document templates based on some basic information you provide about your organization - saving at least some time. They also outline the steps clearly, making it easier to follow.

Committing to a process like SOC 2 is something that, on the whole, is good for an organization. Sure, all of these certifications have their oddities, and some requirements can feel like pure waste. But as with a well-structured codebase, clearly defined boundaries in all-around engineering process are a definite plus.

Comments

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful. Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro...

PydanticAI + evals + LiteLLM pipeline

I gave a tech talk at a Python meetup titled "Overengineering an LLM pipeline". It's based on my experiences of building production-grade stuff with LLMs I'm not sure how overengineered it actually turned out. Experimental would be a better term as it is using PydanticAI graphs library, which is in its very early stages as of writing this, although arguably already better than some of the pipeline libraries. Anyway, here is a link to it. It is a CLI poker app where you play one hand against an LLM. The LLM (theoretically) gets better with a self-correcting mechanism based on the evaluation score from another LLM. It uses the annotated past games as an additional context to potentially improve its decision-making. https://github.com/juho-y/archipylago-poker

"You are a friendly breadwinner"

A recent blog post by Pete Koomen about how we still lack truly "AI-native" software got me thinking about the kinds of applications I’d like to see. As the blog post says, AI should handle the boring stuff and leave the interesting parts for me. I listed down a few tasks I've dealt with recently and wrote some system prompts for potential agentic AIs: Check that the GDPR subprocessor list is up to date. Also, ensure we have a signed data processing agreement in place with the necessary vendors. Write a summary of what you did and highlight any oddities or potentially outdated vendors. Review our product’s public-facing API. Ensure the domain objects are named consistently. Here's a link to our documentation describing the domain. Conduct a SOC 2 audit of our system and write a report with your findings. Send the report to Slack. Once you get approval, start implementing the necessary changes. These could include HR-related updates, changes to cloud infras...

Koodihommia

Search This Blog