My SerenityOS presentation at a local tech meetup

I gave a presentation about SerenityOS, and system calls at a local tech meetup last week.

It took about 20 hours to prepare for the presentation. The original plan was to discuss also subjects other than system calls, but I quickly realized I ought to shave off most of those. KISS, you know, better to focus on one thing.

I needed to dive deep into the nitty-gritty details of how system calls work in Linux. I had to spend some time refreshing my memory by re-reading the Linux Insides book, just to make sure I got the comparison right between SerenityOS syscalls and Linux kernel syscalls. I took a good look at the sysinfo system call Linux kernel code and peeked at its syscall table. It was some intense stuff!

When I started preparing the presentation, Serenity still supported i686 (32-bit Intel) CPU architecture and the system calls used the interrupt-based invocation. That changed just in time for my talk, which was fantastic for my presentation since fast system calls are easier to explain on the Kernel side.

I could undoubtedly be a more articulate presenter; thus, I did ramble through the script some ten times, much to the annoyance of my GF. It helped, but only up to a point, so I absolutely need to practice more for my next talk.

And, of course, I spent a surprisingly long time interrogating ChatGPT. It produces consistent, well-written answers to questions I knew (mostly) the answer to. Yet that was of great help to me in writing the talk script. The answer texts it generated did help me break down the esoteric systems programming concepts into something I can explain to someone less familiar with OS terminology.

The talk has, of course, mistakes in it. The most fundamental is the part where I say that the kernel can do anything, including manipulating user-space memory. Well, it sort of can, but it can do it but only after copying it unless the user-space memory is explicitly shared with the kernel.

Comments

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful. Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro...

PydanticAI + evals + LiteLLM pipeline

I gave a tech talk at a Python meetup titled "Overengineering an LLM pipeline". It's based on my experiences of building production-grade stuff with LLMs I'm not sure how overengineered it actually turned out. Experimental would be a better term as it is using PydanticAI graphs library, which is in its very early stages as of writing this, although arguably already better than some of the pipeline libraries. Anyway, here is a link to it. It is a CLI poker app where you play one hand against an LLM. The LLM (theoretically) gets better with a self-correcting mechanism based on the evaluation score from another LLM. It uses the annotated past games as an additional context to potentially improve its decision-making. https://github.com/juho-y/archipylago-poker

Careful with externalTrafficPolicy

On a project I am working on is hosted in an EKS cluster with the NGINX ingress controller (the one maintained by Kubernetes). It is deployed using it's official official Helm chart, which I realized, after a lengthy debugging session, was a mistake. The initial setup I aimed to improve had several flaws. Firstly, we were using the AWS Classic Load Balancer in front of the nginx ingress in the cluster, which has been deprecated for some time (years?). Continuing to use it makes little sense to us. The second issue was that we were only running one(!) nginx pod, which is quite sketchy since the exposed web services had essentially no high availability. I switched to the Network Load Balancer (NLB), which was straightforward - I just needed to change the ingress-nginx service annotation to specify the load balancer type as NLB: service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-type: nlb However, increasing the replica count turned out to be tricky. When I bumped it up to two, I began to ...

Koodihommia

Search This Blog