Skip to main content

My SerenityOS presentation at a local tech meetup

I gave a presentation about SerenityOS, and system calls at a local tech meetup last week.

It took about 20 hours to prepare for the presentation. The original plan was to discuss also subjects other than system calls, but I quickly realized I ought to shave off most of those. KISS, you know, better to focus on one thing. 

I needed to dive deep into the nitty-gritty details of how system calls work in Linux. I had to spend some time refreshing my memory by re-reading the Linux Insides book, just to make sure I got the comparison right between SerenityOS syscalls and Linux kernel syscalls. I took a good look at the sysinfo system call Linux kernel code and peeked at its syscall table. It was some intense stuff!

When I started preparing the presentation, Serenity still supported i686 (32-bit Intel) CPU architecture and the system calls used the interrupt-based invocation. That changed just in time for my talk, which was fantastic for my presentation since fast system calls are easier to explain on the Kernel side.

I could undoubtedly be a more articulate presenter; thus, I did ramble through the script some ten times, much to the annoyance of my GF. It helped, but only up to a point, so I absolutely need to practice more for my next talk.

And, of course, I spent a surprisingly long time interrogating ChatGPT. It produces consistent, well-written answers to questions I knew (mostly) the answer to. Yet that was of great help to me in writing the talk script. The answer texts it generated did help me break down the esoteric systems programming concepts into something I can explain to someone less familiar with OS terminology.

The talk has, of course, mistakes in it. The most fundamental is the part where I say that the kernel can do anything, including manipulating user-space memory. Well, it sort of can, but it can do it but only after copying it unless the user-space memory is explicitly shared with the kernel.


Popular posts from this blog

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful.  Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro

Extracting object properties from an IFC file with IfcOpenShell

Besides the object geometry information, IFC files may contain properties for the IFC objects. The properties can be, for example, some predefined dimension information such as an object volume or a choice of material. Some of the properties are predefined in the IFC standards, but custom ones can be added. IFC files can be massive and resource-intensive to process, so in some cases, it helps to separate the object properties from the geometry data. IfcOpenShell  is a toolset for processing IFC files. It is written mostly in C++ but also provides a Python interface. To read an IFC file >>> ifc_file ="model.ifc") Fetch all objects of type IfcSlab >>> slab = ifc_file.by_type("IfcSlab")[1] Get the list of properties >>> slab.IsDefinedBy (#145075=IfcRelDefinesByType('2_fok0__fAcBZmMlQcYwie',#1,$,$,(#27,#59),#145074), #145140=IfcRelDefinesByProperties('3U2LyORgXC2f_hWf6I16C1',#1,$,$,(#27,#59),#145141), #145142

Second job

I've taken a hiatus from blogging for the past few months, partially due to laziness but mainly due to the start of my second job. Why take on more work? As a well-compensated developer, I could live comfortably on a single income, could I? Money was not the prime mover but rather the personal development path. Although I can tinker with cool technologies with professional colleagues in my day job, I can't shake the feeling that I may have become too comfortable. There's nothing inherently wrong with being in a comfortable position, but that's not where I'm meant to be right now. I am well aware of the dangers of taking on more work with deadlines, meetings, and time pressures—the typical catalysts of burnout. Therefore, I must let go of some responsibilities. Writing brings me joy, but the preparation involved in preparing technical blog posts (admittedly, there have been few recently) can overheat my mental engine. I'm not advocating for or against voluntaril