Skip to main content

A Finnish web developer works as a consultant

If you ask a random Finnish web developer to detail the projects they have worked on, I bet YLE (Finnish public broadcasting company) comes up. If you further ask to rank the projects, it would likely score high. The devs I've talked to and the Yle talks I've listened to have convinced me that taking a gig in Yle is indeed one of the most remarkable things to do in Finland.


I'm not sure, but I think a US developer might not see working for the PBS as their career highlight.


As a taxpayer, especially working in IT, it is fantastic that Finnish talent works on major, often publicly funded, megaprojects. The digital services are made well, robustly, and rate among the world's best. The developers enjoy working in such places because that all-knowing mentor colleague is sitting next to you. There are few Twitters or other desirable "web-scale" projects available locally. Not incidentally, this means that the barrier of entry is high to get these jobs.


The Finnish developer career goes as follows

  1. You get your first job wherever you can get it.
  2. After a few years, you go to one of the handful of major consultancy firms
    • You work there on some significant Finnish institution as a consultant
  3. The endgame is that you start to work as a (semi) independent consultant or a freelancer
    • You continue to work on the same projects as before but with a better compensation


The downside is that few developers trickle down to the smaller companies. Sure, that is true by definition (a mega institution gobbles up workforce). Less-known startups and already established companies with decent offerings are struggling to grow. The general "lack of programmers" is not as convincing an argument to me due to the relatively high coder-per-capita ratio.


It's just that the coders who are senior enough to be able to pick the next workplace choose not to go to the smaller companies. To me, that is a shame.


You guessed it; I work for a small, profitable, and stable private software product company. I've not regretted my choice!


Need some convincing to steer off the path mentioned above?


    Can I code without thinking about billable hours? - Every day!

    Guess when the next SAFe planning days are? - Never! 

    Do I get paid better than in the big consultancy firms? - Actually, I do! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bird is causing high CPU on my macOS

There is no lack of people complaining about MacOS Tahoe, mostly about rounded corners and inconsistent design decisions. I have not paid that much attentention to that, but there is one mac bug i have paid attention to. It hasn't been a visual or ux but rather few system processes pegging the CPU. trustd , alongside with ecosystemd and ecosystemanalyticsd all reported high CPU usage. I can't exactly recall when this started, it might have predated my Tahoe upgrade but anyway, the trio of processes all had high CPU usage. Sure, it may have been the virtual efficiency cores and whether it affeced battery life or slowed down other processes i don't know to be hon...

How my work has changed in the past few years

When I started at my current job 3ish years ago, we had nothing but a few PowerPoint slides and a Figma prototype. I recall talking with one of the founders, whom I had worked with some 10 years ago, and pointing out that the very next step after PowerPoint and Figma was still the same as it had always been: translating those slides and mockups into CRUDs, forms, and other basic building blocks. Sure, all the new fancy tools and frameworks (we had jQuery then) help, but I still had to tinker with very basic primitives like tables and forms. I could not just say, "here is a table, here is a form." Well, yes, technically I could, but I still needed to write a lot of code to make a working form or table. This was around the time of GPT-3, Copilot beta, and very early Cursor. I did attempt to use them, but they could only perform very basic tasks and were pretty much useless for frontend work. We, being one of the first-wave "ChatGPT wrapper" startups has naturally pus...

Building a OTel sink that follows GenAI semantic conventions

I've been working on an OTel sink recently. To be more specific, it concerns receiving telemetry data from LLM interactions. Fortunately, there is a spec for all of this called GenAI Semantic Conventions . That is what I based my work on, so I can make assumptions about key attributes to highlight in the sink's UI, which is actually a CLI in my case. I dogfooded my handrolled sink using Pydantic AI (my favorite LLM framework), and all good, it follows the spec well. Key attributes flow in as specified. Pydantic AI also includes some of its own attributes, but that is expected. However, pick something like Claude Code, (via anthropic agent sdk), the reality is a bit different. It does not follow the spec at all. It has its own custom attribute layout . Same direction, different flavor with LangChain. The Python source has zero opentelemetry imports anywhere. None. The ls_* namespace ( ls_provider , ls_model_name , ls_temperature ) is its own thing, with LangSmith as the on...