Skip to main content

Note to self: use common collection functions

The Advent of Code in Elixir continues to be a humbling experience year after year. One of my weaknesses in programming puzzles and, in general, is a lack of intuition on which common collection operations to use. Or, to be more precise, since I don't know them intimately, I don't know when to apply them in code. It is way too often I get feedback on a code review on why do you do this thing with a plain map or reduce while you could use this and that helper function. Often, one can replace a custom function with a more expressive composition of well-known "stock" functions.

I think a recap is in order. I enumerate in this post the most useful ones for me - or at least those I get the most feedback from. These are indeed useful even in the basic CRUD app! 

I took the names from Scala and Elixir standard libraries and checked that functions with similar names exist in Lodash and Ramda JS external libraries

Chunk/Group/Split/Partition

Make a list of lists based on a filter or index. Useful, for example, in UI code where you want to show different UI components based on the shape of the data.

Union

Combine two lists with duplicates removed. Useful for funnels. Or combining work in a task queue.

Intersection

Combine two lists with common elements, discard others.

Difference

Returns a list C which contains elements in list A not in list B. 

Not too long ago, I used it in the following scenario

  1.  Given a set of elements
  2.  Send the set to some evil function that wants to destroy one or more of the elements
  3.  The evil function returns a new set of elements with some removed
  4.  Use a difference function to collect the removed elements.
  5.  Use their IDs to remove them from a DB.

Similar case:

  1. List of elements A, B, and C cached locally
  2. Call an API to get the latest state
  3. It responds with elements A, E
  4. Difference one-liner returns the new state

Zip

Form pairs of two lists. Useful for example in pivoting arrays. A classic in the Advent of Code puzzles.


Once again, I have fallen behind badly 😅



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful.  Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro...
Post a Comment
Read more

PydanticAI + evals + LiteLLM pipeline

I gave a tech talk at a Python meetup titled "Overengineering an LLM pipeline". It's based on my experiences of building production-grade stuff with LLMs I'm not sure how overengineered it actually turned out. Experimental would be a better term as it is using PydanticAI graphs library, which is in its very early stages as of writing this, although arguably already better than some of the pipeline libraries. Anyway, here is a link to it. It is a CLI poker app where you play one hand against an LLM. The LLM (theoretically) gets better with a self-correcting mechanism based on the evaluation score from another LLM. It uses the annotated past games as an additional context to potentially improve its decision-making. https://github.com/juho-y/archipylago-poker
Post a Comment
Read more

Careful with externalTrafficPolicy

On a project I am working on is hosted in an EKS cluster with the NGINX ingress controller (the one maintained by Kubernetes). It is deployed using it's official official Helm chart, which I realized, after a lengthy debugging session, was a mistake. The initial setup I aimed to improve had several flaws. Firstly, we were using the AWS Classic Load Balancer in front of the nginx ingress in the cluster, which has been deprecated for some time (years?). Continuing to use it makes little sense to us. The second issue was that we were only running one(!) nginx pod, which is quite sketchy since the exposed web services had essentially no high availability.  I switched to the Network Load Balancer (NLB), which was straightforward - I just needed to change the ingress-nginx service annotation to specify the load balancer type as NLB: service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-type: nlb However, increasing the replica count turned out to be tricky. When I bumped it up to two, I began to ...
Post a Comment
Read more