Skip to main content

Note to self: use common collection functions

The Advent of Code in Elixir continues to be a humbling experience year after year. One of my weaknesses in programming puzzles and, in general, is a lack of intuition on which common collection operations to use. Or, to be more precise, since I don't know them intimately, I don't know when to apply them in code. It is way too often I get feedback on a code review on why do you do this thing with a plain map or reduce while you could use this and that helper function. Often, one can replace a custom function with a more expressive composition of well-known "stock" functions.

I think a recap is in order. I enumerate in this post the most useful ones for me - or at least those I get the most feedback from. These are indeed useful even in the basic CRUD app! 

I took the names from Scala and Elixir standard libraries and checked that functions with similar names exist in Lodash and Ramda JS external libraries

Chunk/Group/Split/Partition

Make a list of lists based on a filter or index. Useful, for example, in UI code where you want to show different UI components based on the shape of the data.

Union

Combine two lists with duplicates removed. Useful for funnels. Or combining work in a task queue.

Intersection

Combine two lists with common elements, discard others.

Difference

Returns a list C which contains elements in list A not in list B. 

Not too long ago, I used it in the following scenario

  1.  Given a set of elements
  2.  Send the set to some evil function that wants to destroy one or more of the elements
  3.  The evil function returns a new set of elements with some removed
  4.  Use a difference function to collect the removed elements.
  5.  Use their IDs to remove them from a DB.

Similar case:

  1. List of elements A, B, and C cached locally
  2. Call an API to get the latest state
  3. It responds with elements A, E
  4. Difference one-liner returns the new state

Zip

Form pairs of two lists. Useful for example in pivoting arrays. A classic in the Advent of Code puzzles.


Once again, I have fallen behind badly 😅



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful.  Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bird is causing high CPU on my macOS

There is no lack of people complaining about MacOS Tahoe, mostly about rounded corners and inconsistent design decisions. I have not paid that much attentention to that, but there is one mac bug i have paid attention to. It hasn't been a visual or ux but rather few system processes pegging the CPU. trustd , alongside with ecosystemd and ecosystemanalyticsd all reported high CPU usage. I can't exactly recall when this started, it might have predated my Tahoe upgrade but anyway, the trio of processes all had high CPU usage. Sure, it may have been the virtual efficiency cores and whether it affeced battery life or slowed down other processes i don't know to be hon...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ousterhout's law

Back in the day, everyone was using Winamp. It is a music player with the user interface of a mixing console. The bloody thing had an equalizer on the front page! As an amateur music producer, I know that EQ is a powerful tool but making changes that sound good is difficult, to say the least. Mixing engineers spend considerable effort with the artist to balance the frequency ranges to arrive at the desired musical outcome. I bet the 15-year-old me butchered a lot of songs with the thing. Now we are using Spotify, a player with basically a search bar and a play button. I ran into something called Ousterhout's Law on the  Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces book . Here is a quote from the book TIP: AVOID VOO-DOO CONSTANTS (OUSTERHOUT’S LAW) Avoiding voo-doo constants is a good idea whenever possible. Unfortunately, as in the example above, it is often difficult. One could try to make the system learn a good value, but that too is not straightforward. The frequent result: a configura...
Post a Comment
Read more