Skip to main content

When React state management is not enough, I use atoms

I'm a fan of Kent C. Dodds. He has an excellent blog, he holds office hours on Youtube and he manages an active Discord community focused on helping developers make maintainable React apps. I especially appreciate the way he thinks about state management in React apps. It does not have to be so reliant on external libraries. React itself is a library for managing state, so why not depend on its built-in abstractions.

On a React Native app I'm building, most (> 95%) of the state management is indeed done with the React primitives: useStates, Contexts, and Refs. It is a big pile of hook compositions, and that's the way I like it. If you are familiar with React and can read its documentation, you can understand the code.

There are a handful of places where using the primitives fall short, though. In these spots, plain old React hooks would require excessive glue code and would ultimately be confusing. Also, skipping needless renders in components such as forms can be tricky with the tools out of the box.

The savior is a shared state with an atom using Jotai! It has a simple useState-like API familiar to a React developer. It does not need stores, providers, or excessive boilerplate. Even the unit tests don't need anything special. I'll not detail how Jotai helps us, but it is a terrific tool to use sparingly.

Jotai was actually the second iteration of atomic state management: we initially used Recoil (0.1.X), but we decided to ditch that. It had some bugs, the most significant of which was a flaw where the selectors would trigger extra renders and not work as a selector should. This was more than six months ago, so I'm sure most of the issues are fixed.

Complying with Kent C. Dodds and plenty of other seasoned React developers, I'll design my React application around the React state management hooks and stick to them as much as possible. When the need arises to introduce something more sophisticated, I use a simple abstraction such as atoms. If the complexity with this abstraction is still too high compared to the added complexity introduced by something like Redux, MST, or Xstate, only then I'll start using them. I'll never start a React project by immediately tightly coupling it to another state management library.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful.  Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro

Extracting object properties from an IFC file with IfcOpenShell

Besides the object geometry information, IFC files may contain properties for the IFC objects. The properties can be, for example, some predefined dimension information such as an object volume or a choice of material. Some of the properties are predefined in the IFC standards, but custom ones can be added. IFC files can be massive and resource-intensive to process, so in some cases, it helps to separate the object properties from the geometry data. IfcOpenShell  is a toolset for processing IFC files. It is written mostly in C++ but also provides a Python interface. To read an IFC file >>> ifc_file = ifcopenshell.open("model.ifc") Fetch all objects of type IfcSlab >>> slab = ifc_file.by_type("IfcSlab")[1] Get the list of properties >>> slab.IsDefinedBy (#145075=IfcRelDefinesByType('2_fok0__fAcBZmMlQcYwie',#1,$,$,(#27,#59),#145074), #145140=IfcRelDefinesByProperties('3U2LyORgXC2f_hWf6I16C1',#1,$,$,(#27,#59),#145141), #145142

Hubristic developer

Almost half of any Finnish generation goes through a shared experience: the conscript army. An integral part of that experience is learning military slang, a set way people in the army talk. The stories told with said jargon often spread outside of the barracks. It is not uncommon to hear strangers bonding together over beers reminiscing and feeling nostalgic about freezing cold nights spent in tents. There is a similar phenomenon detectable among us coders. To be part of the coder tribe, there is at least one type of story that one must master. That is - of course - ranting about legacy codebases. "Can you believe how much of a mess the previous coders left? Hear, hear!" There is no better way to onboard a new team member than to blame some previous B-team for all the murky parts of the system at hand. This can be seen as harmless, a subject for a good  meme . Rarely do we hold real grudges against "the legacy folk" and can be the best of friends in a social gather