Skip to main content

Seriously uncool Java?

A couple of podcasts I have listened to recently have flamed Java. It is a good "kusitolppa", a seriously uncool technology.  I'm pleased about not having to write Java anymore. Yet, I'll risk career suicide and take a stance to defend it against some of the low blows. After all, it was my bread and butter for quite many years.

I get it; writing Java is not in fashion. It is likely a wrong choice for a modern startup. The language is full of mysterious cargo-cultish traditions, is verbose, has annotations on top of annotations and you have to use an editor which eats half of your memory (the other half is used by the Java process you are working on). Traditional Java and JDKs are ill-fitted for short-running processes like lambdas; it needs time to warm to get up to speed and needs more than one core to work efficiently. It has horrible dependency management tools by today's standards. Running a JVM process requires all kinds of weird flags, its defaults are unlikely suitable for any given project.

An often pointed out defect in the old-school Java frameworks is their excessive use of threads. Granted, the traditional, solid but inefficient, thread-per-request model has been pervasive for too long. It's funny why, since the standard library has had the fork-join work-stealing type thread pool in for a decade. You are supposed to use that, preferably through a library or a framework, and never create threads yourself.

Speaking of frameworks, It's not trivial to figure out what is a good JVM framework. The de facto choice is Spring Boot or something expensive from RedHat. I would steer clear of those enterprisey frameworks and pick something like Micronaut or Quarkus. They have a fast startup speed,  don't need massive thread pools (non-blocking IO), and use code generation rather than runtime reflection. I won't even try to do or link any study on their performance compared to other frameworks from other languages since it is notoriously tricky, but I'm sure they are in the triple-A class.

GraalVM's ahead-of-time compilation can speed up startup and reduce the docker image sizes. The new CG's, ZGC and Shenandoah, have finally enabled massive heaps with low latency stop-the-world pauses. Since JDK 8, tiered JIT allows complex, heterogenous codebases to run fast after a warmup period. If a warmup time is not an option, Quarkus with Graal AOT compiled native image should do the trick.

I could go on about how slow and somehow uncomfortable Jest feels compared to plain old JUnit, and what a mess I see when I want to check the TypeScript definitions from the editor compared to the dull but very readable JavaDoc. I love writing TypeScript in VSCode, but I do spend a lot of time resolving all kinds of weird double import errors. IDEA was laggy and slow to start, but it did a lot of coding for me.

My conclusion here is that I would not personally start a new Java project and certainly would not build a startup with Java, but at the same time, I should not discard the JVM ecosystem so blatantly. If I were to choose the JVM, It's a no-brainer to use something like Kotlin or Clojure to get the best of both worlds, a solid runtime, and an expressive programming language.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bird is causing high CPU on my macOS

There is no lack of people complaining about MacOS Tahoe, mostly about rounded corners and inconsistent design decisions. I have not paid that much attentention to that, but there is one mac bug i have paid attention to. It hasn't been a visual or ux but rather few system processes pegging the CPU. trustd , alongside with ecosystemd and ecosystemanalyticsd all reported high CPU usage. I can't exactly recall when this started, it might have predated my Tahoe upgrade but anyway, the trio of processes all had high CPU usage. Sure, it may have been the virtual efficiency cores and whether it affeced battery life or slowed down other processes i don't know to be hon...

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful.  Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro...

Ousterhout's law

Back in the day, everyone was using Winamp. It is a music player with the user interface of a mixing console. The bloody thing had an equalizer on the front page! As an amateur music producer, I know that EQ is a powerful tool but making changes that sound good is difficult, to say the least. Mixing engineers spend considerable effort with the artist to balance the frequency ranges to arrive at the desired musical outcome. I bet the 15-year-old me butchered a lot of songs with the thing. Now we are using Spotify, a player with basically a search bar and a play button. I ran into something called Ousterhout's Law on the  Operating Systems: Three Easy Pieces book . Here is a quote from the book TIP: AVOID VOO-DOO CONSTANTS (OUSTERHOUT’S LAW) Avoiding voo-doo constants is a good idea whenever possible. Unfortunately, as in the example above, it is often difficult. One could try to make the system learn a good value, but that too is not straightforward. The frequent result: a configura...