Skip to main content

Goroutines

Goroutine is an abstraction of go runtime for parallelism and concurrency. Go on runtime has its scheduler, which distributes goroutines to OS threads. The scheduler is split for each native OS thread scheduler, and each scheduler can steal work from others.

I have done quite a lot of actor programming and know a little about different concurrency models. Go's goroutines can be compared to green threads or Erlang VM's processes, although the go community avoids making such comparisons.

The best part of go concurrency is that it is not based on relatively inefficient OS threads. Creating a thread and switching between them is an expensive operation both in CPU cycles and memory terms.

Goroutines should communicate with each other by messaging and not sharing memory. The Effective Go guide states that

 Do not communicate by sharing memory; instead, share memory by communicating. 

A Gouroutine can use a message channel to communicate with other goroutines. Similar to the actor model programming, it is a sort of a message box between one or more goroutines. Some write to it, some read from it.

In a project I am working on, we replaced a python script with a go program. It is part of a machine learning pipeline, so in essence, it is a glorified CSV writer. The python script was a real CPU and a memory hog, so we thought a go rewrite could reduce the resource usage.

What were the results?

We were IO-bound, so we did not get significant speed improvement, but we achieved some gains in reducing resource usage.
The python script took one core and 4G memory - everything it was given by Kubernetes - and then crashed.

 The go program took all the resources as well but did not crash.

 The bad part is that there is about 1.5 times code in the go program compared to the python script.

 Edit:
My presentation about the subject https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-N3ag2rLI4
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm not a passionate developer

A family friend of mine is an airlane pilot. A dream job for most, right? As a child, I certainly thought so. Now that I can have grown-up talks with him, I have discovered a more accurate description of his profession. He says that the truth about the job is that it is boring. To me, that is not that surprising. Airplanes are cool and all, but when you are in the middle of the Atlantic sitting next to the colleague you have been talking to past five years, how stimulating can that be? When he says the job is boring, it is not a bad kind of boring. It is a very specific boring. The "boring" you would want as a passenger. Uneventful.  Yet, he loves his job. According to him, an experienced pilot is most pleased when each and every tiny thing in the flight plan - goes according to plan. Passengers in the cabin of an expert pilot sit in the comfort of not even noticing who is flying. As someone employed in a field where being boring is not exactly in high demand, this sounds pro...
Post a Comment
Read more

PydanticAI + evals + LiteLLM pipeline

I gave a tech talk at a Python meetup titled "Overengineering an LLM pipeline". It's based on my experiences of building production-grade stuff with LLMs I'm not sure how overengineered it actually turned out. Experimental would be a better term as it is using PydanticAI graphs library, which is in its very early stages as of writing this, although arguably already better than some of the pipeline libraries. Anyway, here is a link to it. It is a CLI poker app where you play one hand against an LLM. The LLM (theoretically) gets better with a self-correcting mechanism based on the evaluation score from another LLM. It uses the annotated past games as an additional context to potentially improve its decision-making. https://github.com/juho-y/archipylago-poker
Post a Comment
Read more

Careful with externalTrafficPolicy

On a project I am working on is hosted in an EKS cluster with the NGINX ingress controller (the one maintained by Kubernetes). It is deployed using it's official official Helm chart, which I realized, after a lengthy debugging session, was a mistake. The initial setup I aimed to improve had several flaws. Firstly, we were using the AWS Classic Load Balancer in front of the nginx ingress in the cluster, which has been deprecated for some time (years?). Continuing to use it makes little sense to us. The second issue was that we were only running one(!) nginx pod, which is quite sketchy since the exposed web services had essentially no high availability.  I switched to the Network Load Balancer (NLB), which was straightforward - I just needed to change the ingress-nginx service annotation to specify the load balancer type as NLB: service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-type: nlb However, increasing the replica count turned out to be tricky. When I bumped it up to two, I began to ...
Post a Comment
Read more